Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2011-243
Original file (2011-243.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
 
                                                                                BCMR Docket No.  2011-243 
  
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 

 

 

 
 

FINAL DECISION 

 
 
This proceeding was conducted according to the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and 
section  425  of  title  14  of  the  United  States  Code.    The  Chair  docketed  the  application  upon 
receipt of the applicant’s completed application on August 29, 2011, and subsequently prepared 
the final decision as required by 33 CFR § 52.61(c). 
 
 
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 

This  final  decision,  dated  May  17,  2012,  is  approved  and  signed  by  the  three  duly 

APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS 

 
 
 The  applicant  asked  the  Board  to  change  the  mark  in  block  15a  on  her  DD  Form  214 
(DD 214) from “no” to “yes.”  Block 15a answers the question “whether member contributed to 
Post-Vietnam  Era  Veteran’s  Educational Assistance  Program”  (VEAP).        She  alleged  that  the 
block  15a  is  incorrect  because  it  states  that  she  did  not  contribute to  the Montgomery  G.I. Bill 
(MGIB) plan, when in fact she did so.  She submitted a copy of her leave and earnings statement 
that shows she contributed $1200.00 to the MGIB plan.   
 
 
The applicant’s DD 214 shows that she enlisted in the Coast Guard on October 14, 2008, 
and  was  discharged  on  January  1,  2011,  due  to  weight  control  failure.    It  also  shows  the 
following remark in block 18:  “MGIB INFO:  Member’s initial service contract was for 6 years.   
 

VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 

On October 20, 2011, the Judge Advocate General  (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted 
an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny relief in accordance with a memorandum 
submitted by the Commander, Personnel Service Center (PSC).   

 

 

 

PSC  did  not  recommend  relief  and  argued  that  the  DD  214  is  correct  as  is  and  that  the 
applicant  has  failed  to  substantiate  any  error  or  injustice  with  regard  to  it.    In  this  regard,  PSC 
stated the following: 

 
b. According to [the Personnel and Pay Procedures Manual, PSCINST M1000.2A, 
Chapter  4.C.5.],  “The  Veterans  Education  Assistance  program  (VEAP)  was 
available to any member who first became a member between 1 January 1977 and 
30 June 1985.”  As the applicant was not even born until 1984, she is in no way 
eligible to have participated in the VEAP. 

 

c. According  to  [the  DD  214  Manual,  COMDTINST  M1900.4D,  Chapter  1.E.], 
block 15a only refers to the VEAP, not the Montgomery G.I. Bill, hence why this 
box is correctly marked “NO” . . .    

 

d. The only notation allowed on [the DD 214] with regard to the Montgomery G.I. 
Bill is to be entered in block 18, Remarks, in accordance with the policy found [in 
the instruction].  This notation is correctly entered on the applicant’s DD 214.   

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

 

 

 

The  Board  makes  the  following  findings  and  conclusions  on  the  basis  of  the 

1.  The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 

applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submission and applicable law: 
 
 
of the United States Code.   The application was timely. 
 
 
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard on October 14, 2008, and was discharged on 
January  7,  2011.    She  contributed  $1,200  to  the  Montgomery  G.I.  Bill  program  prior  to  her 
discharge.    She  did  not,  however,  contribute  to  the  VEAP  program  because  that  program  was 
discontinued in 1985. 
 
 
3. Therefore, the mark of “no” in block 15a on the applicant’s DD 214 is correct because 
she  did  not  contribute  to  VEAP.    Block  18  of  the  DD  214  correctly  includes  the  following 
comment with regard to MGIB:  “MGIB Information: Member’s initial service obligation was for 
6 years.” 
 
 
4.    If  the  applicant  is  seeking  MGIB  benefits,  she  should  apply  directly  to  the  nearest 
office  of  the  Department  of  Veterans’  Affairs  (DVA),  since  that  agency  administers  the  MGIB 
program.   
 
 
 
 
 

5.  Accordingly, the applicant’s request should be denied.   

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

 

 

 

ORDER 

The  application  of  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  USCG,  for  correction  of  her  military 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 
Lillian Cheng 

 

 

 
Thomas H. Van Horn 

 

 

 

 
Barbara Walthers 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
record is denied. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2009-187

    Original file (2009-187.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2009-187 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct block 15 of her DD 214 dated September 21, 1990, to show that she contributed to the post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). He noted that the DVA denied her application for MGIB benefits because she was discharged in 1990, and as stated on the MGIB enrollment form, MGIB benefits must be used within 10 years of a veteran’s discharge. The applicant asked the Board to extend her eligibility for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021296

    Original file (20100021296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 to show she contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). The box for "NO" is marked in item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era VEAP) of her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004430

    Original file (20090004430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" instead of "No." The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 14 April 2003, in support of his request. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the VEAP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010183

    Original file (20060010183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant essentially states that her military records are wrong, she contributed $1,200.00 to the MGIB and she is entitled to benefits. The applicant contends that her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that she contributed to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013256

    Original file (20060013256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Also, there is no regulatory requirement to include a statement on the DD Form 214 which shows whether or not a Soldier contributed to the MGIB or not. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show that he paid into the MGIB.

  • CG | BCMR | Education Benefits | 2012-089

    Original file (2012-089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. PSC noted that the applicant seems to be asking the Board for his MGIB benefits and should be told to address his request to the DVA instead, which administers MGIB benefits. The Coast Guard has stated that the applicant’s record is not erroneous and clearly shows that he is entitled to MGIB benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086923C070212

    Original file (2003086923C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests that Block 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program) of the DD Form 214 be changed from "No" to "Yes." The applicant stated in his continuation of the DD From 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, "Member contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted on 15 August 1985.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018541

    Original file (20110018541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). With respect to an entry regarding the MGIB on the DD Form 214, there is no provision in the regulation that governs the DD Form 214 to annotate an entry regarding the MGIB on this form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015764

    Original file (20100015764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The applicant contends that item 15a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the Veteran's Educational Assistance Act (New GI Bill) so that he will not be denied educational benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214, item 15a, is properly marked "No."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003167C070206

    Original file (20050003167C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed high school and that he contributed to the Montgomery G.I. Records show the applicant participated in the MGIB. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected in item 15b to show high school graduate.